Lindy vs Manus
A detailed side-by-side comparison to help you choose the right AI productivity agent for your needs.
Lindy
Lindy is a no-code AI workflow automation platform that lets non-technical users build autonomous AI assistants ("Lindies") that handle multi-step business workflows: respond to customer emails, quali...
- No-code AI agent builder
- 3,000+ integrations (CRM, email, Slack, calendar, etc.)
- Long-running multi-day workflow support
- Prompt-first agent design
- Pre-built templates for sales / ops / HR / CS
- No-code prompt-first builder — accessible to non-technical operators
- 3,000+ integrations covers most SMB + mid-market stacks
- Strong on long-running multi-day workflows that competitors struggle with
- Task-based pricing scales fast for high-volume workflows
- Less control / customization than n8n self-hosted for engineers
Manus
Manus is a general-purpose autonomous AI agent that gained massive viral attention in 2025 for its ability to plan and execute complex multi-step tasks across the web — research, analysis, writing, co...
- General-purpose autonomous agent for any web task
- Multi-step planning + tool use + code execution
- Persistent memory across sessions
- Cloud sandboxed execution environment
- Verifiable output artifacts (docs, sheets, code, diagrams)
- Most capable general-purpose autonomous agent shipped to date
- Verifiable output artifacts make quality review tractable
- Strong on research-heavy multi-source synthesis tasks
- Higher cost than focused agents (Devin for code, Operator for browser)
- Long-running tasks can consume credits unpredictably
Verdict: Lindy vs Manus
Pick Lindy if you need workflow automation for non-technical operators with 3,000+ integrations. Pick Manus if you need general-purpose autonomous ai agent for complex multi-step tasks.
Manus wins on price.
Manus supports 3 models.
Lindy integrates with 10 platforms.
Who should buy this
Lindy
- Non-technical operator (ops / RevOps / HR / CS) wanting to build AI assistants without dev support
- Solo founder offloading repetitive workflows to Lindies
- SMB sales team needing AI-augmented prospecting + email handling
- Engineering teams wanting code-level control (n8n / Browser Use fit better)
- Buyers needing strict on-prem deployment (cloud-only)
Solo: free 400 tasks/mo or $49.99/mo Pro. Mid-market team: $299/mo Business. Enterprise: custom (typically $5-30K+/yr).
Verified 2026-05-06
Manus
- Knowledge worker doing research-heavy multi-step tasks (consultant, analyst, researcher)
- Founder / executive offloading complex multi-source synthesis
- VC / PE professional running due diligence + competitive landscape
- Single-purpose buyers (use Devin for code, Operator for web automation)
- Buyers needing deterministic / repeatable workflows (general agents are less predictable)
Free trial. Standard: $39/mo. Pro: $200/mo. Enterprise: custom annual contracts (typically $10-50K+/yr).
Verified 2026-05-06
Capabilities at a glance
| Capability | Lindy | Manus |
|---|---|---|
| No-code prompt-first builder | — | |
| 3,000+ integrations | — | |
| Long-running multi-day workflows | — | |
| Voice + email + chat handling | — | |
| Templates for sales / ops / HR / CS | — | |
| Public API | Pro+ | Closed beta |
| On-prem / self-hosted | — | |
| General-purpose autonomous agent | — | |
| Multi-step planning + tool use | — | |
| Code execution in sandbox | — | |
| Web browsing + research | — | |
| Persistent session memory | — | |
| Document / spreadsheet / diagram output | — |
Security & compliance
| Standard / control | Lindy | Manus |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Type II | — |
| GDPR | ||
| SSO / SAML | — | |
| RBAC | — | |
| Audit logs | — | |
| Trains on customer data | No | — |
What users say
Lindy
SMB operators, Y Combinator startups, Solo founders
Manus
Y Combinator startups, Independent consultants, VC firms running due diligence
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Lindy or Manus?+
Lindy's Pro plan is $49.99/month and Manus's Standard plan is $39/month. Manus is the cheaper entry point.
What AI models do Lindy and Manus use?+
Lindy runs on GPT-4 family, Claude family. Manus runs on Claude Opus + Sonnet, GPT-5 family, Custom Manus orchestration models.
What is the main difference between Lindy and Manus?+
Lindy is positioned as best ai workflow automation for non-technical operators with 3,000+ integrations, while Manus is positioned as best general-purpose autonomous ai agent for complex multi-step tasks. Pick the one whose strength aligns with your primary use case.
Which has better integrations, Lindy or Manus?+
Lindy integrates with Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Gmail and 6 more. Manus integrates with Web browsing, Code execution sandbox, Document export (PDF, DOCX, XLSX), API (closed beta).
What are the main weaknesses of Lindy and Manus?+
Lindy's main drawback: task-based pricing scales fast for high-volume workflows. Manus's main drawback: higher cost than focused agents (devin for code, operator for browser).
Are Lindy and Manus worth it in 2026?+
Both remain competitive productivity options in 2026. Lindy stands out for no-code prompt-first builder — accessible to non-technical operators. Manus stands out for most capable general-purpose autonomous agent shipped to date. Choose based on which trade-offs fit your workflow and budget.