Cursor vs Bolt.new: Which AI agent is better?
Compare pricing, AI models, integrations, security posture, pros, cons, and buyer fit before choosing the right AI coding agent for your workflow.
Verdict: Cursor vs Bolt.new
Pick Cursor if you need flow and speed. Pick Bolt.new if you need instant full-stack app prototyping.
Cursor wins on price.
Cursor supports 4 models.
Bolt.new integrates with 5 platforms.
Cursor
Cursor is an AI-native code editor built as a fork of VS Code, designed from the ground up for AI-powered development. Its standout feature is Composer, an agentic system that can edit multiple files ...
- Composer agent for multi-file editing with full project context
- Up to 8 parallel agents in isolated git worktrees
- 10+ specialized tools: semantic search, file operations, terminal, browser
- Multi-file refactoring across 12+ files in single operation
- Full VS Code compatibility with extensions support
- Fastest multi-file editing with parallel agents
- VS Code compatibility means zero learning curve
- Isolated worktrees prevent conflicts during experimentation
- Premium tiers required for advanced features
- Resource-intensive with multiple agents running
Bolt.new
Bolt.new is an AI-powered app builder by StackBlitz that lets users create, run, and deploy full-stack web applications directly in the browser from natural language prompts. The platform uses WebCont...
- Full-stack app generation from natural language in browser
- WebContainers technology for instant Node.js environment
- Token-based system with monthly rollover on paid plans
- Built-in deployment with custom domain support
- Support for React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, and more
- Fastest path from idea to deployed app with WebContainers
- Token rollover prevents waste on paid plans
- No local setup needed — everything runs in browser
- Free tier includes Bolt branding on deployed sites
- Token-based pricing can be unpredictable for complex projects
Who should buy this
Cursor
- Solo developer wanting a fast AI-native IDE
- Small team migrating from VS Code without retraining
- Mid-market engineering org evaluating AI-first tooling
- Highly regulated org needing on-prem deployment (no on-prem option)
- Teams already standardized on JetBrains as primary IDE
Solo: $20/mo Pro. Active dev with Composer-heavy workflows: $60–$200/mo (Pro+ or Ultra). Team of 5: ~$200/mo on Teams.
Verified 2026-05-02
Bolt.new
- Solo founder iterating on multiple MVPs in parallel
- Designer wanting to ship interactive prototypes without dev handoff
- Hackathon team needing zero-setup full-stack app generation
- Buyers needing predictable per-month cost (token-based pricing varies)
- Enterprises requiring strict on-prem deployment (cloud-only)
Solo prototyper: Free or $25/mo Pro (10M tokens, often enough for ~3-5 mid-complexity apps). Team: $30/seat/mo. Enterprise: custom (with SSO + audit).
Verified 2026-05-02
Capabilities at a glance
| Capability | Cursor | Bolt.new |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-file refactor | Up to 12+ files per op | — |
| Parallel agents | Up to 8 in worktrees | — |
| Terminal execution | — | |
| Browser automation | — | |
| Code review / PR | Via Bugbot add-on | — |
| JetBrains support | — | |
| On-prem / self-hosted | ||
| API access | — | |
| Browser-based WebContainer runtime | — | Full Node.js in browser |
| Full-stack app generation | — | React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte |
| Built-in deployment + custom domains | — | Pro+ |
| Token rollover | — | Up to 2 months on paid |
| SSO + audit logs | — | Enterprise tier only |
Security & compliance
| Standard / control | Cursor | Bolt.new |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Type II | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | |
| HIPAA | — | |
| GDPR | — | |
| Self-hosted option | — | |
| SSO / SAML | ||
| RBAC | — | |
| Audit logs | ||
| Trains on customer data | opt-out | — |
What users say
Cursor
Shopify, Vercel, OpenAI, Replit
Bolt.new
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Cursor or Bolt.new?+
Cursor's Pro plan is $20/month and Bolt.new's Pro plan is $25/month. Cursor is the cheaper entry point.
What AI models do Cursor and Bolt.new use?+
Cursor runs on Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5.3, Gemini 3 Pro, Custom models. Bolt.new runs on Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro.
What is the main difference between Cursor and Bolt.new?+
Cursor is positioned as best overall for flow and speed, while Bolt.new is positioned as best for instant full-stack app prototyping. Pick the one whose strength aligns with your primary use case.
Which has better integrations, Cursor or Bolt.new?+
Cursor integrates with VS Code extensions, Git, Terminal, Browser automation. Bolt.new integrates with GitHub, Netlify, Vercel, Custom domains and 1 more.
What are the main weaknesses of Cursor and Bolt.new?+
Cursor's main drawback: premium tiers required for advanced features. Bolt.new's main drawback: free tier includes bolt branding on deployed sites.
Are Cursor and Bolt.new worth it in 2026?+
Both remain competitive coding options in 2026. Cursor stands out for fastest multi-file editing with parallel agents. Bolt.new stands out for fastest path from idea to deployed app with webcontainers. Choose based on which trade-offs fit your workflow and budget.